Thematic, innovative and bespoke investment solutions and thinking
Before you use our website we need you to know this. Click on each section for the full information.
We do not offer investment advice to private investors

Absolute Return Partners does not offer investment advice to private investors (Retail Clients as defined by the UK Financial Conduct Authority). All such investors are advised to contact Quartet Investment Managers on +44 20 8939 2920 or visit quartet-im.com.

Our website does not give investment advice

The information contained on the website you are about to access (Website) is for information purposes only and does not constitute and should not be construed as advice on which reliance should be placed, nor is it an offer by Absolute Return Partners LLP (ARP) to enter into any contract or investment agreement or a solicitation to buy or sell any investment in any jurisdiction or in any circumstances. Any information provided in relation to a specific fund is not intended to provide a sufficient basis on which to make any investment decision as any such decision requires careful study of the offering memorandum of the relevant fund.

Information about Unregulated Collective Investment Schemes is not intended for the general public

No information on the Website is intended to amount to the financial promotion of Unregulated Collective Investment Schemes which are not authorized or recognised by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and cannot be promoted to the general public. Any such information is intended solely for certain classes of investors permitted to receive it under relevant legislation and regulations, including investors falling within the qualifying categories set out the Conduct of Business Rules contained in the FCA Handbook or in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Promotion of Collective Investment Schemes) (Exemptions) Order 2005, in each case as amended or replaced from time to time. This is because such investors are sufficiently experienced and sophisticated to understand the risks associated with such investments, including the possibility of a substantial loss or complete loss of their investment.

Our website stores information on your device

Our website uses technologies, such as cookies, to distinguish you from other users of our website, which helps us to provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allows us to improve our site. We do not use these technologies for third-party related advertising or for storing/collecting personal information. For more information please see our Privacy Policy.

You accept our Terms and Privacy Policy when using our website

Before accessing the Website you should carefully read the terms set out in our Terms of Website Use and our Privacy Policy as these will apply to the entire contents of the Website and to any correspondence between us and you.

By accessing any part of the Website you are indicating that you accept these terms and that you agree to abide by them. If you do not accept these terms, do not use the Website.
Agree and close
October 2024

Lessons from two weeks in California

Lessons from two weeks in California

As we approach election day in the US, the outcome of the US presidential election remains very tight. This month's issue of the newsletter reveals 4 lessons learnt from spending 2 weeks in California that sheds some light on the election and the potential impact on financial markets.

Open this issue (PDF)
Preview

In Springfield [Ohio], they’re eating the dogs, the people that came in, they’re eating the cats. They’re eating the pets of the people that live there.

Donald Trump

Arriving in California

I haven’t had a proper holiday in almost five years. A combination of COVID-19, our move back to Denmark and making the grave ‘mistake’ of buying a 100-year old house which required plenty of restoration just made it impossible. An invitation from our dear friends in California therefore came as a godsend.

Apart from queueing almost two hours in immigration at San Francisco Airport, the highlight of the first evening was the televised debate between Trump and Harris which we watched over dinner. And what a show it was. Harris demonstrated a talent for debating which was largely unknown before then, and Trump demonstrated (again) that he is capable of using only one tactic when debating – personal attacks mixed with plenty of lies and half-truths. In the context of investing, I learned plenty of other things which you may find useful, so I have decided to share those lessons with you today. Let’s start.

Lesson #1

Americans are deeply divided. Families are split down the middle, and the two sides hardly talk to each other anymore. In fact, Americans have rarely been as polarised as they are today. If a man walks down the street with a MAGA cap on, he is despised by people from the other side. Quite simply, Democrats cannot wear red baseball caps anymore. Even red, vanilla baseball caps with no political message are frowned upon.

As you can see in Exhibit 1 below, those sorts of views are similar at both ends of the political spectrum. It is hard to find an American today who is not of the opinion that if the other side wins, it will result in lasting damage to the country and to democracy.

Just before we left for California, Dick Cheney, former US Vice-President and a staunch Republican, confirmed he will vote for Kamala Harris in November's presidential election. “He [Trump] tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had rejected him”, said Cheney. “He can never be trusted with power again”. Those are strong words from a man who has voted R his entire life, served under George W Bush and still seen as an influential figure in the Republican party. What is at stake here, according to Dick Cheney, is democracy itself.

Exhibit 1: The impact on the country, should the other side win
Source: Pew Research Center

Lesson #2

More recently, I have been of the opinion that, worst case, the Union may break up. Such is the current level of polarisation. However, an informed person told me that secession is not possible under the US constitution. As per the existing constitutional framework, unilateral secession is impossible. The right to secede does not exist – the power to do so is quite simply not in place. The Civil War resolved that question. You can read more about it here.

In other words, for secession to take place, the constitution must be altered, and that is nearly impossible, such are the hurdles to overcome. There is a reason the last change to the US constitution took place in the late 1780s.

Lesson #3

After taking over from Joe Biden, Kamala Harris has managed, in a few, short weeks, to pull back from the brink and now looks the favourite to win the popular vote, but that does not imply that she is likely to win the keys to the White House. As I am sure you know, the US electoral system is different from the system used in most European countries, and the final result will depend on the outcome in a good handful of so-called swing states. If we exclude those states, she is modestly ahead; however, to win, 270 Electoral College votes shall be required, and she is not even close to that number yet (Exhibit 2).

Exhibit 2: Trump or Harris?
Source: Financial Times

Let’s assume a poll margin of 2% or less makes the state in question too close to call. It is then classified a swing state (collectively referred to as tossup states in Exhibits 2 and 3). As you can see in Exhibit 3 below, there are currently seven of those states, where it is impossible to predict the outcome. If you combine the outcome in Exhibits 2 and 3, it becomes clear that while Harris holds a modest lead at present, things can change from one minute to the next.

Exhibit 3: The current scorecard in the seven key swing states
Source: Financial Times

Lesson #4

As you can see in Exhibit 4 below, in the last few months before election day, the tone in US equity markets tend to be dictated by the performance of the incumbent, and strong equity markets are indicative of a win by the incumbent. Now, this particular election is special in the sense that we don’t have an incumbent. He has decided to retire! The information in Exhibit 4 is therefore of limited value.

Exhibit 4: S&P 500 performance around US presidential elections (%)
Note: Data since 1928
Source:
schroders.com

What is of more value is the observation that US equities typically perform well the first few months following the election regardless of who wins. In Europe, we are used to a negative reaction from financial markets when/if the left come out on top, and the fact that US financial markets tend to react differently suggests to me that most Americans don’t believe the gobbledygook coming out of Trump’s mouth.

Even if he is fond of calling her Comrade Kamala, and all Democrats are Marxists (in his eyes), to many Americans, R and D are still two versions of conservatism. And to those Americans who disagree, I suggest you come and watch European politics for a few weeks, and you will realise what nonsense Trump is on to.

Final few words

The summer has admittedly been a challenge for us, performance-wise, with both June and July suffering from a fading Joe Biden. As Donald Trump’s lead in the polls expanded, so did investors’ appetite for so-called Trump trades, which resulted in the green agenda being pushed to the backburner. We are quite big on the green transition exposure-wise, so our June and July returns suffered as a result.

Then came the turmoil in early August where, for a few days, it looked like the bull market was well and truly over. Consequently, at about the time Kamala Harris entered the race for the White House, our performance numbers did not look good.

Harris’ rapid rise in the polls changed everything, though, Suddenly, investors were happy to own green stocks again, and nuclear came back into favour. Having said that, my two weeks in California reminded me that, in the US, national polls are pretty useless. Whether D wins California by 65/35 or 75/25 is utterly meaningless. The number of Electoral College votes remain the same.

In the US, it is all about those few swing states, and the playing field remains wide-open there. Whether you vote for R or D, what looks good today may look pretty awful tomorrow. Therefore, the key lesson is a simple one – be prepared to pull the trigger if needed. Things can change in minutes.

Niels

2 October 2024

Investment Megatrends

Our investment philosophy, and everything we do at ARP, is driven by the long-term Investment Megatrends which are identified and routinely debated by our investment team.

Related Investment Megatrends

Our investment philosophy, and everything we do at ARP, is driven by the long-term Investment Megatrends which are identified and routinely debated by our investment team. Read more about related Megatrend/s for this article:

About the Author

Niels Clemen Jensen founded Absolute Return Partners in 2002 and is Chief Investment Officer. He has over 30 years of investment banking and investment management experience and is author of The Absolute Return Letter.

In 2018, Harriman House published The End of Indexing, Niels' first book.

What are your thoughts? Leave a comment