Thematic, innovative and bespoke investment solutions and thinking
Before you use our website we need you to know this. Click on each section for the full information.
We do not offer investment advice to private investors

Absolute Return Partners does not offer investment advice to private investors (Retail Clients as defined by the UK Financial Conduct Authority). All such investors are advised to contact Quartet Investment Managers on +44 20 8939 2920 or visit quartet-im.com.

Our website does not give investment advice

The information contained on the website you are about to access (Website) is for information purposes only and does not constitute and should not be construed as advice on which reliance should be placed, nor is it an offer by Absolute Return Partners LLP (ARP) to enter into any contract or investment agreement or a solicitation to buy or sell any investment in any jurisdiction or in any circumstances. Any information provided in relation to a specific fund is not intended to provide a sufficient basis on which to make any investment decision as any such decision requires careful study of the offering memorandum of the relevant fund.

Information about Unregulated Collective Investment Schemes is not intended for the general public

No information on the Website is intended to amount to the financial promotion of Unregulated Collective Investment Schemes which are not authorized or recognised by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and cannot be promoted to the general public. Any such information is intended solely for certain classes of investors permitted to receive it under relevant legislation and regulations, including investors falling within the qualifying categories set out the Conduct of Business Rules contained in the FCA Handbook or in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Promotion of Collective Investment Schemes) (Exemptions) Order 2005, in each case as amended or replaced from time to time. This is because such investors are sufficiently experienced and sophisticated to understand the risks associated with such investments, including the possibility of a substantial loss or complete loss of their investment.

Our website stores information on your device

Our website uses technologies, such as cookies, to distinguish you from other users of our website, which helps us to provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allows us to improve our site. We do not use these technologies for third-party related advertising or for storing/collecting personal information. For more information please see our Privacy Policy.

You accept our Terms and Privacy Policy when using our website

Before accessing the Website you should carefully read the terms set out in our Terms of Website Use and our Privacy Policy as these will apply to the entire contents of the Website and to any correspondence between us and you.

By accessing any part of the Website you are indicating that you accept these terms and that you agree to abide by them. If you do not accept these terms, do not use the Website.
Agree and close

Faster than a Speeding Bullet

Faster than a Speeding Bullet

At ARP, we want to keep our readers informed. Last Saturday, we wrote a piece to address three questions:

1) Will Biden withdraw?

2) Who would replace him?

3) Can he or she win?

Yes, we did predict a near-term Biden withdrawal. However, before we could publish, the first two questions were answered. Joe Biden did the honourable thing and put country and party before himself. Whatever you may think of him, you must give him a tip of your hat. This sort of behaviour is not seen very often.

The third question remains extant and relevant. Can Kamala Harris win? This is relevant for many reasons, not least as far as market implications are concerned. However, will Harris actually get the nomination? Let’s deal with that first. The short answer is yes.

NASA’s definition of a planet is straightforward. Does it clear the neighbourhood around its orbit? Biden’s immediate and full endorsement of Harris cleared the orbit. If this race had started much earlier, the Democrats would have had a number of potentially very strong candidates, including Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan (an important swing state), Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, Josh Shapiro, Governor of Pennsylvania (another important swing state), and several other very credible candidates. Kamala Harris may not have succeeded in a competitive race but that never happened. In the immortal words of many people, “we are where we are”.  

Harris’ potential opponents quickly rallied around her – except for the Obamas. Michelle Obama is an extremely popular Black woman and might be the only person who could now realistically deprive Harris of the nomination, and she would arguably be a much stronger adversary for Trump. But perfection is the enemy of the good. Michelle Obama has often stated she is not interested in running for President, having done her eight years in the White House with her husband, Barack.

Harris has lined up an impressive array of important endorsements, she has raised a prodigious amount of money in a very short time, and she has apparently been endorsed by a sufficient number of convention delegates to win the nomination. Michelle Obama might have had an opportunity had Biden not been so clear and so immediate in endorsing Harris. But, as noted above, this cleared the Harris orbit.

Can Kamala Harris win?

As of late last week, the betting odds on the Presidential race from Real Clear Politics were Donald Trump leading strongly at 61.3%, followed, interestingly, by Kamala Harris at 17.7%.  Joe Biden was running third at 9.7%, significantly trailing not only Trump but also his VP. Trailing Biden at 2.8% was Michelle Obama – the dream candidate for many Democrats who has repeatedly stated that she and Barack have done their term of national service.

As of the 24th of July, the odds have shifted. Trump still leads strongly at 56.4% (down from 61.3%), followed by Harris at 35.7% (up from 17.7%). Clearly, a Harris win will have different investment implications than a Trump win. We have already seen the post-debate Trump Trade, which was (and still is) damaging to the green agenda but positive for healthcare, fossil fuels and certain other industries. No Harris Hurray is yet apparent. That said, in a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted earlier this week, has Harris leading Trump by 44% to 42%. At the very least, the race has tightened significantly.

What to watch for

• Biden was not polling well with Black, Latino and young people. Watch to see if Harris will be able to re-ignite and re-establish historical or better levels of support with these groups. Early indications are that she will.

Women are a key constituency. Harris has a long record in favour of abortion. Biden’s firmly held Roman Catholic faith made him a less effective advocate for abortion rights. If abortion becomes a major issue, and it almost certainly will, it will help Harris.

Non-college educated men who, historically, made up a solid Democratic constituency. As the Democratic party embraced some ‘culture’ issues, this group drifted away. Can Harris bring them back? Being a Black woman with a liberal voting record, the odds are not in her favour.

Didn’t Kamala Harris’ flame burn out in 2020? She withdrew from the race even before the Iowa caucuses. She was a wooden, uninspiring, speaker. Like Biden and Trump, she can be given to speaking ‘word salad’. She can also speak in platitudes. However, in 2020, Harris’ strongest card was her record as a strong Attorney General in California. Unfortunately for her, the Democratic race in 2020 shifted to the left, leaving her adrift. In that race, Harris tried to shift left too – entirely unconvincingly. The point here is that her record as an Attorney General may be more compelling in 2024, running in a national race, not a Democratic primary, against a convicted felon. This is already manifesting itself in her early speeches.

How will Trump respond to running against a younger Black woman? In the past, Trump – particularly when challenged which Hilary Clinton didn’t do effectively – lashes out.

The betting odds still favour Trump. But let’s not forget, odds are not a prediction. Odds reflect the weight of money, and there is still a long way to go to the 5th of November.  Investors believing in the green agenda (including ARP) have already suffered from the Trump Trade. At ARP, we think this has more or less runs its course. However, we do not see a Harris Hurray anytime soon.

We conclude that the election outcome is far from clear at this stage, but that market implications are significant. The outcome will likely have a dramatic impact on  equity returns, i.e., stakes are high. Stay tuned…!

Austin Erwin

25 July 2024

About the Author

Austin Erwin joined Absolute Return Partners in 2023 bringing a wealth of experience in Banking industry. Austin is the Chief Risk Officer at ARP.